What's better to use in PHP for appending an array member:
$array[] = $value;
or
array_push($array, $value);
Though the manual says you're better off to avoid a function call, I've also read $array[] is much slower than array_push(). Does anyone have any clarifications or benchmarks?
No benchmarks, but I personally feel like $array[] is cleaner to look at, and honestly splitting hairs over milliseconds is pretty irrelevant unless you plan on appending hundreds of thousands of strings to your array.
Edit: Ran this code:
$t = microtime(true);
$array = array();
for($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++) {
$array[] = $i;
}
print microtime(true) - $t;
print '<br>';
$t = microtime(true);
$array = array();
for($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++) {
array_push($array, $i);
}
print microtime(true) - $t;
The first method using $array[] is almost 50% faster than the second one.
Run 1
0.0054171085357666 // array_push
0.0028800964355469 // array[]
Run 2
0.0054559707641602 // array_push
0.002892017364502 // array[]
Run 3
0.0055501461029053 // array_push
0.0028610229492188 // array[]
This shouldn't be surprising, as the PHP manual notes this:
If you use array_push() to add one element to the array it's better to use $array[] = because in that way there is no overhead of calling a function.
The way it is phrased I wouldn't be surprised if array_push is more efficient when adding multiple values. EDIT: Out of curiosity, did some further testing, and even for a large amount of additions, individual $array[] calls are faster than one big array_push. Interesting.
Word on the street is that [] is faster because no overhead for the function call. Plus, no one really likes PHP's array functions...
"Is it...haystack, needle....or is it needle haystack...ah, f*** it...[] = "
From the php docs for array_push:
Note: If you use array_push() to add one element to the array it's better to use $array[] = because in that way there is no overhead of calling a function.
A simple $myarray[] declaration will be quicker as you are just pushing an item onto the stack of items due to the lack of overhead that a function would bring.
Second one is a function call so generally it should be slower than using core array-access features. But I think even one database query within your script will outweight 1.000.000 calls to array_push().
One difference is that you can call array_push() with more than two parameters, i.e. you can push more than one element at a time to an array.
$myArray = array();
array_push($myArray, 1,2,3,4);
echo join(',', $myArray);
prints 1,2,3,4
The main use of array_push() is that you can push multiple values onto the end of the array.
It says in the documentation:
If you use array_push() to add one element to the array it's better to use $array[] = because in that way there is no overhead of calling a function.
Although the question was more about performance, people will come to this question wondering if it's good practise to use array_push or $arr[].
The function might mean lesser lines for multiple values:
// 1 line:
array_push($arr, "Bob", "Steve");
// versus 2 lines:
$arr[] = "Bob";
$arr[] = "Steve";
However, array_push...
I'll be sticking with $arr[].
Since "array_push" is a function and it called multiple times when it is inside the loop so it will allocate a memory into the stack. But when we are using $array[] = $value then we just assigning value to array.
I just wan't to add : int array_push(...) return the new number of elements in the array (php doc). which can be useful and more compact than $myArray[] = ...; $total = count($myArray);.
Also array_push(...) is meaningful when variable is used as stack.