We’re in process of designing caching strategy for a heavily used web-site. The site consists of a mix of dynamic and static content. The front-end is PHP, middle tier is Tomcat and mysql on the back.
Only user login screen is done over HTTPS to secure the credentials. After that, all content is served over plain HTTP. Some of the screens are specific to the customer (let’s say his last orders), while other screens are common to everybody (most popular products, promotions, rules, etc).
Given the expected traffic volume it’s clear that we need a comprehensive caching strategy. So we’re considering following options:
It’s possible that we will use a combination of those strategies.
So the question is whether it's worthwhile to add front cache like Varnish, or just use Zend Cache inside?
The other option that i forgot to mention is to use PHP-level cache like Zend Cache and store there fragments of the pages. This is close to the second option that i mentioned but it's built into the Zend framework.
So the question is whether it's worthwhile to add front cache like Varnish, or just use Zend Cache inside?
Thanks again, Philopator.
I've done quite a few projects like this and found that:
These days I like Varnish a lot: it's a separate layer that doesn't clutter the Java/PHP code, it's fast and very flexible. Downside is that the configuration in vcl is a bit too complex.
I typically use ehcache + in memory storage to avoid latency (e.g. database queries or service requests) with small data sets, and memcached when there's a lot of data and the cache needs to shared by multiple nodes.