实例锁不是只有一把吗？为什么读写锁模式可以多线程同时调用含有synchronized的read方法？

最近在看java多线程设计模式时遇到如下问题 有点搞不懂了！问题：实例锁只有一把，而synchronized方法会获得实例对象的锁，下面程序是读写锁的线程，我不明白为什么实例锁只有一把，而读写锁可以多线程同时调用读方法，假设读者线程1调用Data中的read方法，进而调用了readLock方法，获得ReadWriteLock的实例锁，那么读者线程2为什么也可以调用这个synchronized限定的readlock方法，此时的锁不是给了线程1吗？线程2没有锁怎么去调用readlock方法呢？

 

public final class ReadWriteLock {
    private int readingReaders = 0; // (A)...实际正在读取的执行绪数量
    private int waitingWriters = 0; // (B)...正在等待写入的执行绪数量
    private int writingWriters = 0; // (C)...实际正在写入的执行绪数量
    private boolean preferWriter = true; // 写入优先的话，值为true

    public synchronized void readLock() throws InterruptedException {
        while (writingWriters > 0 || (preferWriter && waitingWriters > 0)) {
            wait();
        }
        readingReaders++;                       //  (A)实际正在读取的线程数量加1
    }

    public synchronized void readUnlock() {
        readingReaders--;                       //  (A)实际正在读取的线程数量减1
        preferWriter = true;
        notifyAll();
    }

    public synchronized void writeLock() throws InterruptedException {
        waitingWriters++;                       // (B)正在等待写入的线程数量加1
        try {
            while (readingReaders > 0 || writingWriters > 0) {
                wait();
            }
        } finally {1
          waitingWriters--;                   // (B)正在等待写入的线程数量减1
        }
        writingWriters++;                       //  (C)实际正在写入的线程数量加1
    }

    public synchronized void writeUnlock() {
        writingWriters--;                       // (C)实际正在写入的线程数量减
        preferWriter = false;
        notifyAll();
    }
}
// 数据类
public class Data {
    private final char[] buffer;
    private final ReadWriteLock lock = new ReadWriteLock();
    public Data(int size) {
        this.buffer = new char[size];
        for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {
            buffer[i] = '*';
        }
    }
    public char[] read() throws InterruptedException {
        lock.readLock();
        try {
            return doRead();
        } finally {
            lock.readUnlock();
        }
    }
    public void write(char c) throws InterruptedException {
        lock.writeLock();
        try {
            doWrite(c);
        } finally {
            lock.writeUnlock();
        }
    }
    private char[] doRead() {
        char[] newbuf = new char[buffer.length];
        for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {
            newbuf[i] = buffer[i];
        }
        slowly();
        return newbuf;
    }
    private void doWrite(char c) {
        for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {
            buffer[i] = c;
            slowly();
        }
    }
    private void slowly() {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(50);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        }
    }
}

这个 synchronized 不是给读写加锁，而是给获取读写锁前的操作加锁，获取到后 synchronized 就已经释放了，读写本身是没有锁的

你说的也没错，由于ReadWriteLock这个类里的所有方法都是synchronized，在同一对象下，线程1在调用readLock方法时，线程2确实进不了readLock，但也就那一瞬间而已，线程1立马就释放了。你真正的读方法是doRead()，该方法并没有锁。