[kernel32 ReadProcessMemory]问题出在哪里?

def findaddr(process_handle, basic, one, two):
	data1 = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), basic, ctypes.byref(data1), 4, None)
	data2 = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data1.value + one, ctypes.byref(data2), 4, None)
	return data2.value + two

def findaddrplus(process_handle, basic, one, two, three):
	data1 = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), basic, ctypes.byref(data1), 4, None)
	data2 = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data1.value + one, ctypes.byref(data2), 4, None)
	data3 = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data2.value + two, ctypes.byref(data3), 4, None)
	return data3.value + three

这是我的屎山代码,所以我要改进它,但它失效了.

def findaddr(process_handle, basic, *offsets):
	data = ctypes.c_long()
	kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), basic, ctypes.byref(data), 4, None)
	for i in range(len(offsets) - 1):
		kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data.value + offsets[i - 1], ctypes.byref(data), 4, None)
	return data.value + offsets[-1]

这个代码的问题可能出在这一行：

kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data.value + offsets[i - 1], ctypes.byref(data), 4, None)

在第一次迭代时，当 i = 0 时，offsets[i - 1] 会访问列表 offsets 的最后一个元素。这可能导致访问越界的问题。

您可以将该行代码更改为：

kernel32.ReadProcessMemory(int(process_handle), data.value + offsets[i], ctypes.byref(data), 4, None)

这样就会使用正确的偏移量进行读取。